top of page

The Dark Knight Rises

3/1/23

Directed by Christopher Nolan

Rating 7.8/10

Christopher Nolan's conclusion to his Dark Knight trilogy is a sensational finish that overcomes its contrived plot conveniences through earnest and sheer emotional impact. 

 

After watching The Dark Knight Rises, it was evident that Christopher Nolan had his finish line in mind but struggled to pace out the steps to reach it. The cracks within this return to Gotham are visible between the rushed editing, outlandish story corrections, and feeble plot twists. 

 

Eight years after the events of The Dark Knight, Bruce Wayne/Batman (Christian Bale) has been a recluse since killing Harvey Dent to save Jim Gordon and his family. Gotham was saved by the lie that Harvey Dent was an upstanding man who took down organized crime in Gotham, leading the city into peacetime. Batman ended up taking the fall, and the existence of that falsehood is what much of the thematic heft is based on in The Dark Knight Rises. The vulnerability of living on this lie to keep a city's integrity and culture intact is visible as those seeking to destroy Gotham will want it to start with the people themselves. 

 

In this third installment of Nolan's Batman trilogy, Bane (Tom Hardy) is the lead villain who is revealed to be a former member of the league of shadows, an organization led by Ra's Al Ghul (Liam Neeson). Batman destroyed Ra's and the league of shadows in Batman Begins, saving Gotham from the group's chaos. Bane is rumored to have been excommunicated by the league of shadows but still seeks to dismantle the city of Gotham. Unfortunately, Tom Harry's performance is stunted by the entertaining mask that hides his voice acting and overall impact, but his presence is certainly worthy of a Nolan Batman villain. 

 

The dismantling of the rich and superior class is a heavy theme reiterated by Bane's overall goal to give the city back to the people and fulfill the plan laid out by Ra's Al Ghul in Batman Begins. It is satisfying for Nolan to attempt to connect the beginning and end of his trilogy on a similar thematic note. However, the film's themes retread familiar ground to a fault with the repetitive messaging. Eating the rich and attempting to employ a chaotic dismantling of Gotham's society, Bane's plan for Gotham is to become a Marxist society that needs a revolution. Although that is the appearance Bane wants to show the public, he truthfully desires Gotham to be in ashes. Ra's al Guhl's philosophy was that Gotham was beyond saving and that corruption had become intertwined into the fabric of their society. 

 

The score composed by Hanz Zimmer and Nolan's spectacular moments is built to an epic crescendo, giving the Dark Knight Rises its peak, memorable moments. The initial fight between Batman and Bane, the climactic battle, and the climb out of the pit are scenes that blend melodrama and sensation to spine-tingling results. The first fight between Batman and Bane creates a shocking sequence in which Batman is overpowered to the point of embarrassment. Nolan's ability to expertly craft cinematography and engaging characters while injecting his focused narrative on justice allows for engrossing sequences that most superhero films are unable to replicate. 

 

The triumphant return of bale into the caped crusader outfit has a different meaning this time around. Bruce's mentor and butler, Alfred (Michael Caine), confronts Bruce's fragile state of mind. Ever since Rachel, the woman he loved, died due to the events in The Dark Knight, he has blamed himself. Wayne is teetering on the line between life and death as Alfred tells him that he's afraid if he goes back out there at Batman, he wants to fail. 

 

The pathos surrounding Wayne's existence creates a different feeling in the film compared to The Dark Knight and Batman Begins. The absence of fear and the welcoming of death prompts Bane to make Bruce suffer instead of killing him. The torture for Bruce is watching Gotham devolve into chaos as he cannot save the city. 

 

A group of new intriguing characters joins Gotham's core, including Joseph Gordon Levvit's Robin origin story and Anne Hathaway as the best live-action Catwoman that transcends campiness. 

 

Within the chaos of Bane taking over Gotham and besting Batman through combat, James Gordon is trapped inside the city. Justice and morality come center stage as the judgments from The Dark Knight are addressed. Bane comes across. Commissioner Gordon's letter admits the truth about Harvey Dent and reveals the mendacious story Gordon fueled to the public. At this moment, the spirit and thematic messaging come full circle from The Dark knight to The Dark Knight Rises. Blake confronts Gordon after Bane reads Gordon's script to the public on television:

 

John Blake: "Those men locked up for eight years in Blackgate, and denied parole under the Dent Act, based on a lie?"

 

Jim Gordon: "Gotham needed a hero..."

 

John Blake: "It needs it now more than ever. You betrayed everything you stood for."

 

Jim Gordon: "There's a point, far out there when the structures fail you, and the rules aren't weapons anymore, they're... shackles letting the bad guy get ahead. One day... you may face such a moment of crisis. And in that moment, I hope you have a friend like I did, to plunge their hands into the filth so that you can keep yours clean!"

 

I found this to be the most engaging statement from any character throughout the film, beyond Bane's rants and Batman's sometimes quirky one-liners that began to wear thin. This emphasis by James Gordon provides deeper characterization for Blake, who, after the film's final battle, tells Gordon he can't continue being a cop knowing the corruption and 'shackles' Gordon described. Thrusting a new hero and icon into the role of Batman required the trust of authority and policing to be flawed. Nolan's exploration of this side plot for Blake is an intriguing portrayal of a human who can connect with Bale's Bruce Wayne and continue to hold the torch. 

 

The Dark Knight Rises presents a satisfying yet flawed conclusion to a trilogy that grounded the caped-crusader in realism, allowing for a resonant characterization of a symbol of justice. It's reiterated many times throughout the trilogy, but never more than in The Dark Knight Rises, that Gotham needed a figure to represent hope for a better society. Bruce's principles expressed the hope that a city filled with corruption is not hopeless as long as there is an inspiration for those who have the virtue to follow a hero like Batman 

maxresdefault 9.jpeg

I Am Legend

2/24/23

Directed by Francis Lawrence

Rating 7.4/10

Upon fading in, the monotone sounds of newscasters describing the state of the world have uneasiness given the silence in the background. However, once we cut to Dr. Alice Krippin (Emma Thompson), who claims they've cured cancer, the stillness around the dialogue increases the eerie atmosphere in this opening sequence. Then, suddenly, we fast forward to three years later, viewing a desolate, collapsed New York City as a haunting image. 

 

While action performances tend not to be as revered as dramatic roles, I Am Legend is Will Smith's career-defining performance, superior to The Pursuit of Happiness or King Richard. 

 

I Am Legend was released when Smith was considered the most bankable star in Hollywood due to his charisma and ability to waver between drama and comedy convincingly. I Am Legend provides a vehicle for Will Smith to command the film at his own pace while demonstrating his dramatic talents through a unique lone-wolf portrayal. It's an astonishing feat for an actor to maintain the audience's emotional engagement in a solitary portrayal. Smith's committed intensity to this role epitomizes his leading man qualities while even leaving room for comedic moments that shockingly land due to his charisma. 

 

 I Am Legend is genuinely the one-person show it's billed as. Smith dominates every scene, while he becomes more unnerved each day. Smith plays the role of Dr. Robert Neville, who, to his own knowledge, is one of the last humans alive. He is determined to stay at ground zero, to cure the disease precisely where it started, which means living a dangerous life with only his dog Sam at his side. 

 

Director Francis Lawrence brilliantly sets up this post-apocalyptic world by taking us through the preparation and precautions Neville must take each night to survive. The shrieks, the banging, and the sound editing implant a growing fear into the audience. The set design of creepily decaying posters, destroyed buildings, and grass growing on the streets depicts a decaying world. 

 

The infected that hunt Neville at night are more horrifying when they are in hiding, proving the point of less is more with horror movie villains. Hearing their shrieking, banging, and animalistic sounds sewed fear early on in the film. Unfortunately, their menacing presence is mitigated once the hunters are visually revealed. Nevertheless, the tension between the hunters lasts intensely for almost an hour through the film, maintaining a frightening adversary. 

 

In the film's most horrifying scene, Sam chases a deer into a large building, which causes Neville to sprint after her into the darkness. As Neville's footsteps become what separates him from life and death, his flashlight gives us a haunting peak into a hive of hunters asleep while they stand sleeping and breathing vigorously. The scene escalates to a peak when Neville painfully says goodbye to Sam as he can't find her and can't risk dying in this building until Sam pops out. Neville runs towards the window desperately for survival as the seekers sprint ferociously after him. Relating to vampires, the seeker that jumps out the window at Neville is burned and killed by the sun's light, giving a narrative element that will come into play later on. 

 

Besides Smith's performance and Lawrence's tension-filled direction, an impactful element of I Am Legend is the genre-mashing apparent throughout the script. It initially comes off as a post-apocalyptic thriller/action film. However, as the narrative unfolds, the moments that turn into horror sequences are the most outstanding, rivaling modern horror films. I Am Legend tells a somber and demanding story for a Hollywood blockbuster film, suggesting the crossing over of genres can lead to unprecedented success. The remarkable moments in I Am Legend represents the triumph of throwing a bit of risk at a Hollywood thriller. 

 

As the story continues, Will Smith's infectious pathos emotionally draws us into his deteriorating world. The seekers he's pitted against start to show an intelligence he didn't think possible, nor did the audience. They make a strategic move against Neville, breaking his fragile psychological state. Loneliness and dread have driven Neville's attention away from being focused on precautions. As the seekers' plan works, Neville lets down his guard and is captured by a rope trap and hung upside down, being knocked by his collision with the ground. Hours later, he awakens to Sam barking at him while realizing in a haze that dawn is coming and crawls towards his car as infected dogs sprint and attack Neville and Sam. Sam sacrifices and protects Neville to the point of being infected. Neville has to put down Sam alone as Neville cannot cure the infection within her. The camera focuses on Smith's face as he regretfully and painfully puts an infected Sam to sleep, giving Sam peace. While this action alleviated Sam, Neville must live alone now and have another scar in this unforgiving world.  

 

Neville's expression shows defeat and hopelessness as he spirals toward a harrowing end. When Neville finally loses hope and tries to commit suicide by killing as many seekers as possible, a woman named Anna miraculously saves him. She is traveling with a young kid named Ethan, and seeing Neville's interaction with them portrays the struggle to reintegrate into society after an apocalypse of this magnitude. It's almost unbelievable for Neville to witness humans speaking to him. 

 

The most informative and expositional dialogue about Neville's world comes from his discussion with Anna, who still has faith in her religion and believes god still has a plan for those alive. 

 

Neville loses his temper and ragefully yells at her:

 

 "Let me tell you about God's plan. Seven billion people on Earth when the infection hit. Five point four billion people dead. Crashed and bled out. Dead. Less than one-percent immunity. That left twelve million healthy people like you, me, and Ethan. The Other five hundred and eighty-eight million turned into your dark seekers, and then they got hungry, and they killed and fed on everybody. Everybody! Every single person that you or I has ever known is dead! Dead! There is no God!"

 

The enraged passion from Smith in this mini-monologue is a powerful and captivating statement that provides enlightening background information while explaining Neville's pessimism. However, his speech also brings up the concept of science and religion that never becomes fully fleshed out. If there is a religious motif within the film, it's muddled and overridden by the bombastic third act. Anna tells Neville that God has told her of a survivor's colony in Vermont, a belief that causes Neville to scoff. The movie's inability to keep a footing in its third act essentially robs it from becoming an exemplary Hollywood blockbuster that would've broken the stagnant norm. Instead, the film cannot confront the more profound themes of faith and hopelessness it lazily injects into the screenplay. 

 

It's rare for the masses to prefer a film's alternate DVD ending, but the executive decision to keep the original conclusion mutes Neville's vision's narrative and emotional impact. 

 

Among others, a strikingly negative aspect of the film is the questionable CGI of the "dark seekers," which breaks the realism since this group of villains are the main antagonists. 

 

Instead, the conclusion to Neville's mission is deceptive to the film's message and has an outright contradictory moment of realization that derails the story. Conversely, The film constructs a breathtaking depiction of Neville's solitude and the human condition in extreme circumstances in a manner that Hollywood blockbusters wouldn't dare to explore. There is praise deserved towards I Am Legend for its successful portrait of various genre traits and Smith's captivating performance. Unfortunately, the narrative faults, shoddy third act, and technical issues weigh down I Am Legend from becoming a triumph while making it settle to be an intriguing, emotional viewing with unfulfilled promise. 

 

Since Lawrence, scriptwriters, or Warner Brothers executives decided to deviate from the brilliant source material, using the alternate ending would've fulfilled the film's hopeful goal, which is epitomized in this quote from Neville,

 

 "The people who are making this world darker are not taking a day off, how can I? Light up the darkness." 

2061826260_18693aebc5_o-jpg.webp

Nosferatu

1/20/23

Directed by F.W. Murnau 

Rating 7.6/10

 F.W. Murnau's Nosferatu remains a horror classic that popularized a vampire's characteristics while innovating the horror genre's traits.

 

Although Nosferatu was released in 1922 in black and white color, its ability to hold modern audiences, attention remains strong due to its engaging cinematography, thematic heft, and haunting atmosphere. Additionally, the titular character, played by Max Shreck, supremely displays the practical effects and acting. Nosferatu's grotesque features, including pointy ears, buggy eyes, sharp teeth, claw-like fingernails, created a lasting and initial image to movie audiences of what the terrifying character of Dracula could appear to be.

 

Yet, many may not find Nosferatu frightening or comparable to modern horror films in terms of craft and fear levels. Although the film is dated in some respects, there is impact, ingenuity, and effective horror within nosferatu, making it one of the most influential films in the horror genre. For example, Murnau is known for introducing audiences to the montage, which compares a Venus fly trap to Nosferatu. The dangerous, murderous tendencies of a venus fly trap are then compared to a spider killing its prey in a web. Both animals display Orlok's imminent threat and are immediately followed up by a scene of Orlok on the boat he's using to enter society. Murnau's attention to detail and innovative foreshadowing creates atmospheric evil that awaits Knock at his destination. In addition, there are simple albeit iconic uses of cinematography in Nosferatu, especially where a low-angle shot captures Orlok rising from the coffin, towering over the camera.

 

The ability to create a haunting mood and atmosphere without sound is indeed an early master class of cinema while being a template for the horror genre. 

 

The story of Nosferatu follows a real estate agent named Hutter, who his boss sends to meet Count Orlok at his estate in Transylvania. Orlok is interested in buying a house in Hutter's hometown of Wisborg. Hutter meets Orlok at his castle, appearing freakishly upon meeting him, and his sinister plans only begin to unfold. Nosferatu demonstrates a supernatural presence in work as well as in the horror genre. Hutter's wife Ellen senses the danger Hutter is in at the castle and can even visualize Orlok's threat to her husband's wellbeing from across the lands. We learn that Orlok is lustful, given his actions towards sucking Hutter's blood sensually, creating a growing theme revolving around sexuality for the film's leading monster, which deepens his characterization. When Nosferatu finally arrives at Wisbrog, the natural beauty of Hutter's wife, Ellen, distracts him, which hints at his bisexuality. Scholars have tied Orlok's bisexuality being related to director F.W. Murnau's accepting and explorative attitude, considering he was a homosexual in the film business in 1922.

 

While identifying and setting the template for horror films, Murnau employed revolutionary techniques that contributed to the horror genre and cinema.

 

There is an eerie, unshakable feeling witnessing Count Orlok standing still in the doorway for the very first time. His walk is almost lifeless, creating a sense of dread that Max Shreck embodies in his take on Dracula. Unlike the multiple future iterations, Shreck's Dracula isn't personable or persuasive. Instead, he is closer to being a monster of the German habitat than having human mannerisms. An essential lesson of the modern horror genre that can still learn from Nosferatu is the convincing and terrifying aspects of practical effects, and the idea of less is more. Although Orlok is used sparingly in the film and a majority of his appearances are memorably unnerving, whether it's the coffin scene or doorway, Orlok's existence is threatening even while still.

 

Part of what gives the character of Dracula his mysterious and haunting presence is the difficulty of classification of what he is in many of the film adaptions. Especially in Nosferatu, his character is given an unclear background that only adds to the mysterious aspects of the monster. While distinguishable, his features don't allow a definition of our world but rather create a fear of the other. The other is an unidentifiable, sinister threat that is unwelcome and unfamiliar.

 

Author Bram Stoker created the story of Nosferatu during a time of German expressionism and the growing sense of anti-Semitism within the German community that eventually led to World War ll. The character of Nosferatu invades like the rats that escape from the ship he uses to transport himself to society. He latches onto the living, using them to further his life purpose, to survive. There are clear comparisons of the plague when showing the rats to Orlok as he invades the town. A powerful testament to Nosferatu's lasting impact is the resonant themes of xenophobia, fear, and sexuality that currently contribute to modern horror cinema. Even a whole section of the film relates to the occult. Knock, Hutter's boss, worships Orlok since being brainwashed by him while being a symbol of the erratic and unstable mental states german expressionism sought to portray.

 

Nosferatu portrays Dracula at its most pure and original on screen. As we see from 1922, the first film adaption of Dracula may have the most complex symbolism regarding its various themes. The xenophobia, sexuality, and plague elements of the film all combine to create a movie ahead of its time. Murnau was pushing the creative boundaries of filmmaking in a time of German expressionism, where artists were deciding on taboo topics to tell their stories. Atypical subjects such as psychological behaviors such as insanity or panic were presented in German expressionism. The outcome of WWl had left German society in a mentally unstable condition, which led to the exploration of intellectually challenging themes not explored beforehand. Exaggerated imagery filled with darkness and bombastic shapes dominated the screens of German expressionist films. Nosferatu represents the intriguing artistic leaps achieved during German expressionism while using them to solidify horror as a respected genre in cinema. 

Print-Issue-38-biz_screen-Puss-In-Boots-MAIN-Publicity-H-2022.webp

Puss in Boots: The Last Wish

12/28/22

Directed by Joel Crawford

Rating 7.8/10

It is a rare feat for a sequel 12 years in the making to surpass expectations and become a clear improvement over its predecessor but Puss in Boots: The Last Wish achieves unlikely and shocking success.

 

The story picks up where we left Puss in Boots (Antonio Banderas) as a swashbuckling, confident, charismatic cat with no fear. The film opens with a catchy musical number and reminds us of The Puss in boots we first met in Shrek 2 and further explored in the titular movie Puss in Boots in 2011. The preconceived notions of Puss' lifestyle and this film are soon thrown out the window as clever writing and a newfound decision to approach the animation from an anime perspective. Fight scenes include slow-motion, exhilarating action that one would find in anime classics. The film forsakes the realistic, crisp animation style favoring a comic-book look that gives it a fresh layer of engaging action. It is a delight to see DreamWorks testing modern methods for their films and showing their openness to inspiration from other areas of the animation world.

 

As far as the story goes, the themes are rather adult and mature while still being able to translate well to younger audiences. The inciting action is set in motion by introducing the film's villain, the Wolf. At first, the Wolf appears to be a determined, sadistic enemy who is determined to defeat Puss in battle, taking his ninth and final life. Puss has become a supercilious being who lived his life bravely but carelessly, and on the night the Wolf visits him, he has just lost his eighth life. Puss being down to his final life, sets a precedent in the story's trajectory and the mature themes that follow. After a dangerous fight against the Wolf in which Puss runs away, fearing losing his final life, he decides that his fighting days are over. The decision to hang up the weaponry and retire is reminiscent of classic western films. The decision to rely on western tropes becomes even more apparent once Puss decides that finding the fountain of youth is his ticket to fixing his anxiety and despair toward losing his final life. The opportunity to reach immortality motivates Puss to not give up.

 

This treasure hunt leads Puss on an adventure against adversaries who seek to find the fountain and claim the priceless reward for themselves. As the story progresses, we run into a familiar face, Kitty Softpaws (Salma Hayek), a past love interest for Puss. The two cats team up with Perrito, a dog who is not only a scene-stealer of comic relief but a touching portrait of a naïve character who struggles with accepting their own identity. Puss in Boots: The Last Wish succeeds tremendously on the imaginative, hilarious, and charismatic side characters, whether it's Perrito cursing with bleeps covering his swears or a parody of Jiminy Cricket named Ethical Bug, who serves as the voice of reason for one of the villains Big Jack Horner (John Mulaney). Beyond all the creativity of the characters who clash on the journey to find the fountain of youth, the most potent aspect of the film is the overarching theme of fear of death. Puss is followed continuously by the Wolf, who is quickly understood to be a physical form of death itself. The Wolf reveals to Puss that he wants to take Puss' final life, primarily because of the frivolous way Puss treated and lost his other lives in the past.

 

We witness something nobody could've predicted we view on screen in a Puss in Boots film, a searingly honest and dispiriting panic attack that evokes a visceral response from the audience. This was one of the many aspects of the film that elevates it above the crowded Hollywood animated field. As Puss sees the Wolf throughout the film, sometimes as a haunting imaginary image, the threat grows more and more immediate for Puss. The portrayal of perturbation in Puss in Boots: The Last Wish revolves around the essential themes of the film of the inescapable reality of death and living our one life to the fullest without hubris.

​

What damages Puss in Boots' chance of becoming a modern animated classic is that the film's narrative hits familiar beats without subverting expectations. The attempt to push the story to a different level of insightful lessons and thoughts about what makes our one life special would've built upon its reliable premise. The film's impact is also bogged down by spreading itself too thin among the supporting characters. Yet, there is one character that the runtime would've benefited from more focus on, the Wolf. The bold portrayal of death in a film for a wide age range paid off, largely thanks to its central antagonist. The brilliant voice acting from Wagner Moura, brooding character design, and threatening dialogue all combined to create a villain worth revisiting. Of course, there is a positive outcome when a film sparsely includes its villain, but Wolf's significant screen presence had the opportunity to go beyond the film's success. Rarely has a DreamWorks villain come across so menacingly that it rivaled other modern classic antagonists, and unfortunately, that well-crafted character didn't reach its full potential.

 

Although Puss in Boots: The Last Wish falls short of being a triumph, its leading man is scratching at the door to Pixar's throne of modern animated sequels and is a worthy challenger to the finest recent Hollywood animated tales. Given that Disney and its sub-company Pixar have failed to achieve the success of some of their modern classics (Up, Ratatouille, WALL-E, Coco), it leaves the door open for DreamWorks to continue to push the limits for creativity in a film style that must cater to children and adults. The cherry on top of this surprising long-awaited sequel is its ability to resurrect a franchise that could have easily been presumed dead. One of the film's most memorable moments was its ending, leaving on such a high note that it filled fans with anticipation for the franchise's future.

Malignant-Trailer.Image-01.jpg

Malignant

10/2/22

Directed by James Wan
Rating 5.1/10

James Wan’s new horror effort unintentionally parodies his cinematic successes in a cringe-worthy film that takes ambitious risks to a painfully hilarious fault. 

 

Wan’s signature craft is seen in pieces of Malignant. The shaky cinematography witnessed in Insidious, and The Conjuring franchises using wide-angle shots of desolate living rooms to build tension is at work here. What derails this film is the zany vision that pushes it beyond the boundaries of even enjoyable B-movie horror cinema. 

 

Going into Malignant and expecting a typical Wan film will undoubtedly set you up to be subverted. It is noticeable within the opening segments that there is a brash, idiosyncratic pace to this film that has no intention of slowing down. Quick, inadvertently comical deaths start to make you question what type of film Wan has crafted. The initial murder scenes appear with a mix of terror and comedy, rendering the sequences unable to blend the genres seamlessly.

 

 Is Wan parodying his recent horror successes, such as the Insidious and The Conjuring franchises? Is he making a point about the decline of those franchise's quality in films after his departure? Malignant takes such questionable leaps and turns that it raises these unfortunate questions. 

 

Malignant focuses on a woman plagued by visions of murders committed by a goofy antagonist dressed in a black cloak. The kills bring out B movie charm, and the dialogue almost seems to be a hilarious jumble of mad libs built from horror cliches. Yet, Wan crafts immersive moments of thrill through CGI nightmare sequences to attempt a balancing act with his wacky prosthetics. There are creative glimpses seen through some of the murder scenes where Wan fidgets with household equipment, but the film then results in violence and gore that leaves the audience with a repetitive, bloody mess. It was shocking to witness a Wan film that instilled barely a genuine scare in a plot designed to pump them out like clockwork. 

 

Not even halfway through the film, the so-called “twist” becomes glaringly apparent that you may find yourself watching to see if it plays out in the manner it’s leading us to. 

 

For viewers of Wan’s previous filmography, Malignant appears as a playful experiment gone hilariously wrong. Unfortunately, the film can’t even sustain enough traction with its nonsensical plot, frustrating characters, unremarkable twist, and lack of terrifying moments to become a cult classic. Those with no knowledge of Wan’s work may leave less frustrated. Still, even newcomers will most likely find themselves in a muddled horror film that unknowingly crosses the line into horror-comedy without the usual enjoyment of such a fare. Once the expected twist arrives, you’ll be laughing your way to the finish line, trying to buy into the ludicrous product Wan is selling. 

 

There is ambition in the artistry of the mise en scène and plot, but they continue to be outdone by relationships trapped in a screenplay plagued by soap and cliches. 

MV5BZjU0Yzk2MzEtMjAzYy00MzY0LTg2YmItM2Rk

Jojo Rabbit

9/3/22

Directed by Taika Waititi 
Rating 6.3/10

​

Taika Waititi’s irreverent black comedy misses the mark more than it hits in a murky-toned political satire.

​

Having a vague grasp on Taika Waititi’s past comedic work would make one hopeful of this project on paper. Yet we receive a film that struggles to hit any of the bullets points it sets out for. Among these is Waitti’s Jim Carrey-like performance as a goofy imaginary Hitler performance that echoes Mel Brooks imitated satire. Deciding to Placate Hitler would work if the screenplay picked a direction instead of designing a capricious comic relief of Hitler whose moments of seriousness hold no weight.

 

The film romanticizes its characters in a troubling way that provides no satirical bite and lacks any substance while strangely attempting to imitate Wes Anderson's cinematography. At first, the film sets itself up to critique the society that would bring up a misconstrued and hateful way of life Jojo lives. Yet, it settles to paint Jojo as the most integral villain in Nazi-occupied, we don’t know where.

 

Jojo’s mother, Rosie (Scarlett Johansson), whose performance is mediocre and lacks the passion needed for her select moments of attempted grace. What's more puzzling is the Oscar nomination she received for best-supporting actress while Aldis Hodge, Zhao Shuzen, and Jennifer Lopez were denied nominations. Rosie is hiding a Jewish girl in the attic of their house and is secretly a part of the anti-nazi movement within her borders. Her trajectory could have been much more impactful if Waititi could prevent himself from following the goofy line of dialogue.

 

The Jewish Girl hiding in Jojo’s attic Esla (Thomasin McKenzie), performs satisfactorily but leaves much desired from her brilliant turn in 2018 Leave No Trace. Much of the story revolves around Elsa becoming a plot piece for Jojo to understand the flaw in his ways and the Nazi regime. This adaption would instead display Elsa as a shallow device for Jojo’s arc as her motives and dialogue become more and more predictable. There is no way of convincing the audience that the capable and witty Elsa believes the forged letters from Jojo.  Fueled by his adolescent curiosity and childlike infatuation, Jojo scribes forged letters posing to be Elsa’s husband. The letters provide no emotion or gripping moment to elevate the stunted narrative due to their shallow execution.

 

There are moments of wit and comedic insight that aren’t given the progression needed to grow, such as the implied homosexual relationship between Captain Kletzendorf (Sam Rockwell) and his second-in-command Finkel (Alfie Allen), which is poorly milked for a few laughs.  The passionate performance from Sam Rockwell is wasted as the shockingly pleasant Nazi captain whose sympathy for Jojo is perhaps the most affecting piece that remains unexplored. His dislike for Germany and Nazi culture is expressed to the point of saving Jojo in the tensest scene in the film. The Gustapo appears on the doorstep of a frightened Jojo, who, at this point, has now learned the error of his ways. Deertz (Stephen Merchant) leads the group inside, providing a tense portrayal that slowly but surely loses its edge due to Waititi’s inability to restrain his signature humor. The film culminates in a painfully staged war scene that evokes no emotion and displays no attempt to not appear as a backlot set. After the war ends, Jojo struggles to be honest with Elsa. He lies to Elsa, telling her that Germany has won the war and what they will do when she discovers the truth. Laugh it off and dance because Elsa said she would when she became free. The narrative makes promises to the audience that provides no emotional rewards while setting itself up for a mediocre finish. The finished product contains scenes from amateur horror short films, irreverent, goofy tantrums from Hitler, and a lack of appropriate levity.

 

Waititi’s brand has thrived in his obscure environments, such as the notable Thor: Ragnorak or his cult comedic hit, What We Do in the Shadows—Waititi's journey into topical satire leaves scattered moments of laughs and a gaping hole of thematic purpose.

 

Jojo Rabbit fails to provide insight, modest laughs, or an emotional message. Moments that come close are drowned out by Waitti’s urge to mitigate the horrors and actions of the story. Waititi’s film lacks the satirical bite of Mel Brooks while struggling to provide its reasoning to speak his unique voice on such a consequential time in history.

no-time-to-die-imax-poster-slice.jpeg

No Time To Die 

11/9/21

Directed by Cari Joji Fukunga 
Rating 7.2/10

No time to die features Daniel Craig's final outing as Bond in the most impassioned bond film to date that unfortunately falls victim to a fatally flawed story while pulling at the heartstrings. 

 

No time to die attempts to wrap up Craigs’ turn of the character by trying to tie loose ends from his past Bond adventures to middling returns. The most outstanding issue is the story and the pacing of a flawed and lackluster narrative that brings no surprises to the screen. Returning characters feel forced to draw sympathy from the audience rather than allowing viewers to experience his journey organically. We witness the relationship between Bond and his love interest in the opening action spectacle of a scene. 

 We’re then dragged along, apparently convinced and gripped by a love we never really had the time to experience and know. This leaves Bond’s quest empty, and although there is a result that evokes sadness, it is barely earned and reaches a disappointing conclusion of its potential to make us care about his relationship. 

 

The acting, the cinematography, and the barebones of this film are all executed to some of the highest standards demanded by audiences today. The issues within the characters and story overshadow a competent cast and crew.

 

An Integral problem to the story’s effectiveness is the central villain Lyutsifer Safin played by Rami Malek. Instead of Malek rising to the occasion and holding his own up to the higher level of past Bond villains such as Waltz and Mikkelson, he becomes an unintended comical caricature. At first, one would question his limited screen time, and after finishing the film, one may be thankful it turned out that way. 

 

The most exciting and welcoming side characters, played by Ana de Armas and Christopher Waltz, merely visit the film for no more than 20 minutes and then leave us for the rest of this snail-of-action epic. 

 

The story is paced poorly and revolves around Bond’s romance with Isabella Swan (Lea Seydoux), which we only see bloom in the film's opening segment, and it is then squashed away. Most of the plot is bond slowly chipping away at unraveling a mystery with no rewards to the audience. The payoff to his character is delivered, and he is given a proper send-off, but the journey is a grueling slog. The high points are where we visit old memories of Craig’s bond, whether it’s a visit to Waltz’s gripping mastermind of a character or witnessing the rise of Armas as a possible female action star. 

 

It becomes a recurring theme of this film to execute ideas and plot points that would’ve aided the film but swiftly removed them, damaging the integrity and ability of the film to maintain a gripping story. While it did break the mold in certain areas and delivers a poignant conclusion that Bond films rarely do, it stretches in too many directions to provide the satisfying finale Craig’s Bond deserved. 

Dont-Look-Up-Posters_edited_edited_edited.jpg

Don't Look Up 

12/27/21

Directed by Adam McKay
Rating 6.9/10

Heavy-handedness can ruin the integrity and verisimilitude of a film. In the case of Don’t Look Up, the audience falls victim to a satire that hits a few potent marks along the way while getting off track into a preachy political ideology feast. 

 

In terms of the political climate, don’t look up is attacking, the heavy-handedness may seem appropriate to Adam McKay, and at some points, it is. McKay brings his signature flair from his hit film The Big Short and attempts to tackle another social issue but returns with mixed results. 

 

Leonardo DiCaprio gives the most gripping performance out of the cast as an out-of-place astronomer trying to navigate the media world amid an impending catastrophic event. Unlike others of his past, his performance may not be worthy of an Oscar nomination, but it is enough to convince the audience of the madness he witnesses as his character.  

 

A significant flaw in Mckay’s script is the tangents characters will go on that derail the plot and authenticity of the message he attempts to convey. These moments of side banter are mainly from by-side characters that only harm the film and provide mild comedic moments. The most effective comedy comes from the cringe-worthy reactions and decisions made by political figures. Also, the now-and-then pop culture reference will bring a laugh about how absurd a society we could be trending towards. 

 

This is undoubtedly a divisive film, splitting almost right down the middle for audiences. This divisiveness stems from the political figures in the movie and their selfish decisions only to accumulate more popularity and wealth while others suffer below them. It’s a simplistic narrative with barriers that may have audiences roll their eyes at the references, but it will depend on their pop culture and political ideologies. 

 

 Don’t Look Up may improve with age as audiences could look back on this film as a representation of a turning point in American society. A time when media, technology, and morality collided to highlight the grave danger Don't Look Up attempts to reveal about our political and moral standards in the United States. 

matrix_edited.jpg

The Matrix Resurrections 

12/23/21

Directed by: Lana Wachowski
Rating: 4.9/10

"There's so much we don't know." Those ironically painful words highlight this muddled film that deconstructs everything that made the original Matrix a modern Sci-fi classic. 

​

Director Lana Wachowski pulls out every cliche and trope, attempting to tell a story that no longer relies on powerful storytelling but instead on the sappy power of love. 

​

The first 30 minutes of The Matrix Resurrections appear as an intriguing, modern revival. As the narrative unfolds, everything that once made the original Matrix special is eliminated. Once we discover the reason for the characters' existence is for marketing purposes, and plot points exist solely because "there's so much we don't know," audiences immediately lose respect and attention for the film. 

​

Characters in the film claim that what Neo (Keanu Reeves) had done in the original trilogy was not for nothing, but we slowly realize we're back to square one. The Matrix is as dangerous as ever as the free humans live in a large city that hides from cyborgs.

 

The exceptional quality of Neo and the infectious atmosphere of The Matrix is missing from this lost sequel. Where the original Matrix had those awe-inspiring moments of action, realization, and hope, The Matrix Resurrections settles for the love defeats all motto. It crushes the soul and spirit of what made these films come off the screen. Perhaps not having both Wachowski siblings to write and direct this film is where it initially went off the rails. Ultimately, we're left with an ending that pushes an agenda without any purpose or meaningful story behind it. Additionally, the finale is left open-ended for more painful marketing ploys like The Matrix Resurrections. 

snh_online_6072x9000_posed_01.jpeg

Spiderman: No Way Home

12/17/21

Directed by Jon Watts
Rating 8/10

Tom Holland and the ensemble of superheroes and villains create an otherworldly atmosphere in a multiversal superhero film over 20 years in the making. The juggling of this talented cast is executed tremendously as Marvel attempts a grandeur, more adult spiderman film in the current MCU. 

​

As the film breaks box office records, Marvel will start to consider the power of the multiverse, recalling older, nostalgic characters back to the screen. 

​

Out of all the noticeable names and actors, Dafoe's Green Goblin steals the show as the energetic and unpredictable villain that pushes Holland's Peter Parker to his moral limits. The action films, while relying on CGI spectacle at times, also make room for raw fight scenes that don't rely on cheap editing cuts many viewers fall victim to. No Way Home overshadows many films in the MCU due to its nostalgia factor and a fast-paced plot that brings the audience along with Peter's quest to keep his status safe as the friendly neighborhood spider-man. It plays upon several age groups and their connection with spiderman and manages to please them all. 

​

Personal redemption, fixing one's mistakes, and having the will to do what one believes is right in the face of adversity all come across Peter Parker's path, whether through the supporting cast or his journey. Ultimately, as we gravitate to a more adult Spider-man, understanding the power of sacrifice helped Holland's Parker and the audience realize the lengths we'll go to protect the ones we love. It's a familiar theme, and films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe often are on the end of unfair treatment as their criticized for their predictable formula. Whether it's being only able to tell an origin story or a film where heroes learn to work together, films in this universe do fall into that trap quite often. Spiderman: No Way Home serves as a momentous step forward for the MCU by being a superhero film that writes an addition to the formula. It demonstrates how to effectively bring justice to mistreated characters and push a beloved main character to new heights. 

​

With the MCU trending towards galactic adventures off the earth, Spider-man may be the most exciting and enticing avenger left on earth for Marvel fans. 

​

​

MV5BMDJmNzM4OTAtZTM4MS00YWRiLThmNTItN2I5N2JmYzcwMDBhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTA3MDk2NDg2._V1_.jpg

The Night House 

10/28/21

Directed by David Bruckner
Rating 7.7/10

Rebecca Hall commands the screen in a  gripping yet partially flawed horror film that creates a haunting atmosphere many modern horror films fail to conjure.

​

The subjects of grief, the afterlife, and the mystery of not knowing the one closest to you haunt the main character Beth (Rebecca Hall), whose husband has just committed suicide as we watch Beth's daily life unfold as a middle school teacher, dealing with what now are meaningless parts of her life compared to an unknown sinister side of her late husband's life that she begins to unravel.

​

Director David Bruckner's visual style makes the Night House unique and rises above the typical horror fare beside Hall. In replace of jump scares and overcrowded CGI, we enter the visually haunting world Beth starts to find herself in. Whether through the perfectly timed tonal lighting or the optical illusions in the cinematography of the pure dread we witness on screen, Bruckner and Hall have crafted a modern horror film with a classic Hollywood spooky atmosphere. 

​

This intelligent and emotional film combines satanic beliefs, grief, and dread in a riveting slow-burn fashion. It subverts the successful modern horror films from the conjuring franchise by crawling through one woman's fearing discovery of evil itself. What's missing from The Night House is a sensible ending, explanations for a small number of holes in the story, and sometimes a meandering plot. However, that shouldn't deter any horror fan from missing out on this atmospheric horror treat. 

​

Eternals-1-e1634659002762_edited.jpg

Eternals 

11/8/21

Directed by Chloe Zhao 
Rating 6.6/10

Chloe Zhao honorably attempts to lift the  Marvel Cinematic Universes' questions of morality to new heights, resulting in a bloated MCU epic that becomes a visually dazzling, action-packed mess that may more appropriately fit into the lackluster DC universe of shallower stories.

​

In Eternals, we focus on a group of immortal heroes whose powers will not seem that unfamiliar to superhero movie viewers, but their circumstances may be unique. They are a centuries-old group of beings tasked with following the orders of a celestial named Arishem, who will certainly seem otherworldly, even considering what we've seen in the MCU thus far. They have been tasked to protect the world from deviants, an enemy is hidden for years, and they fall under the trap of many other Marvel villains, they're just not at all compelling or exciting. The Eternals were even sidelined during the events of Avengers: Infinity and Endgame due to the nature of their purpose. Marvel needed a good reason as to why these overpowered beings never went toe to toe with Thanos, and the eye-rolling choice was that they were told not to interfere with human conflict unless deviants were involved. 

​

What damages the integrity of this film is the lack of chemistry between its heroes and Zhao's inability to figure out whom to spend her time focusing on. By the time the climax arrives, we neither care for the heroes nor are gripped by the world-ending plot, which has been beaten to death, especially in superhero films. 

​

Zhao bravely tackles bolder themes than Marvel has decided to tiptoe around until recently. Her goals are lofty, and the discussion around whether or not the Eternals should've interfered over the years n human conflict to help was perhaps the most exciting concept throughout this film. This is where Zhao draws the line between moral right and wrong between her main characters and sets up her third antagonist, spreading this plot dangerously thin. It's no longer enough to have a superhero film where a group of otherworldly beings' troubling coalescence becomes the basis of your story. That began with The Avengers in 2012 and has evolved since. Concerning plot and story beats, Zhao takes a step backward by not providing characters to root for in a story that tried to inject pathos into the journeys of its characters but instead made us question what is drawing us to this new set of characters. 

​

Eternals brings you only a portion of the staples of the MCU one would expect by now, including state-of-the-art effects and an action-packed finale. What's missing from the Marvel formula here is humor that hits the mark and correct casting, which are partly correlated. The most exciting part of this film is the end credit scenes, which set up an intriguing new hero and a new crew that will probably serve as a tier-up in terms of entertainment the what we witnessed in Eternals. 

​

I commend Zhao for her thought-provoking questions and for trying to deepen the MCU by tackling deeper themes than the typical origin story or superheroes just learning to work together. Unfortunately, throughout this stretched-out mess, the realization of how poor the project was is where the cinematography, visual effects, and typical MCU post-credit scenes end up being the high points in this plodding affair. 

 

Kevin Feige and the marvel fanbase will take notice of the mixed reception to this film which I think is the biggest travesty throughout this project. We finally got the opportunity of dealing with heavier themes in the MCU, and due to the underwhelming outcome, the idea may be eradicated from the MCU. What would be best is if this level of thematic storytelling stayed on the marvel docket but was reframed for a superior story and vision. 

©2020

 by CinemaPath

bottom of page